Is Inhumanity Necessary for War?

I am, above all, a Christian—one who has been made one with Christ, a member of His family by grace through faith, and subsequently and consequently a devout follower of Christ. The Bible says that my citizenship is in heaven. But as long as I'm on earth, I'm also a citizen here. This dual citizenship poses many dilemmas for the Christian, not least of which is whether and to what extent Christians may be involved in war.
This is not the time or place for an all out discussion of the legitimacy of war, generally speaking, from a Christian perspective. Let's assume for the sake of argument that, at face value, it is a legitimate tool of justice and order, and hence the good of mankind as a whole, in a fallen world. If so, there must be a way to engage in the killing of human beings while also remaining obedient to the Way of Jesus expressed in such commands as "love one another" and "love your enemies."
Something I read this morning caused me to question whether or not this is possible in so-called "modern civilization." No doubt most of you have heard of, if not viewed, the video of a U. S. Army helicopter gunning down innocent civilians as well as American reporters in Baghdad in 2007. This New York Times article highlights a deeply troubling angle on modern warfare.
Consider these quotes from the article:
  • "The soldiers joked, chuckled and jeered as they shot people in the street"
  • "'Look at those dead bastards,' one said. 'Nice,' another responded."
  • "fighters cannot do their jobs without creating psychological distance from the enemy"
  • "You don’t want combat soldiers to be foolish or to jump the gun, but their job is to destroy the enemy, and one way they’re able to do that is to see it as a game, so that the people don’t seem real"
  • "Military training is fundamentally an exercise in overcoming a fear of killing another human"
In other words, according to psychologists and the military trainers who employ their insights, desensitizing soldiers to the humanity of "the other" is a vital part of training for war. This should give us, at the very least, pause—especially Christians. How is this compatible with Christian ethics? Answer: It isn't. If we are going to conduct war ethically (if that's even possible), then we'd better figure out a way to do it in a way that honors those we are killing as beings created in God's image and loved by Him. War is a horrible thing. Soldiers mustn't be calloused to the gravity of what is taking place. Maybe instead of desensitizing them and dehumanizing "the other," we should rethink what is indeed humane. May God raise up Christians in the military who will refuse to comply with inhumanity and will reform combat training accordingly.

Comments

  1. how is it possible to take one's life without denying their humanity? Do you think this is actually a possibility?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I do believe it is possible... even necessary at times. If not, the ethics of the Old Testament completely fall apart. Justice demands punishment for wrongdoing, and for some offenses, death. By holding people accountable for their actions, we actually affirm the humanity of all persons. Inversely, by allowing perpetrators off the hook, we deny the humanity of the victims. "Crimes against humanity" (e.g., murder) break the covenant of unity between persons, and the only way to reconcile that breach is through justice.

    A lot more could be said and has been said on this. By no means am I offering here a definitive defense of capital punishment (of which war is a macrocosm) or retributive justice more generally. I would suggest exploring those issues via good books on the subject. My main concern is with whether it is possible to train warriors without desensitizing them to the humanity of others. If not, then war is not a valid enterprise for Christians.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The question you ask is a valid one. Unfortunately I do not think there is an answer. If you find one, please let me know. I think we can both agree that any so-called justice that denies anyone's humanity (victim or perpetrator) is no justice at all. It is my belief that any form of capital punishment inevitably destroys the humanity of both victim and perpetrator precisely because we must deny the humanity of the other in order to carry it out. It is the Old Testament that affirms this. If we see the unique role of Israel in salvation history in regards to war, we will be on much firmer ground in establishing ethics.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "capital punishment ... destroys the humanity of both victim and perpetrator ... because we must deny the humanity of the other in order to carry it out."

    This is not prima facie true. What's your basis for arguing this?

    ReplyDelete
  5. If I understand you correctly this is your original question. If there are times when it is right to take the life of another human being, how do we do so without losing their (or our) humanity? I don't think this can be done. To take someone's life, we must deny the image of God within them. When we kill we say to God, "this creation is not good and must not exist". I believe this is why we see capital punishment in the Old Testament; God acts through Israel to work as He pleases. Israel acts but only under the authority of God Himself (this is drastically different than just the sense that all government is given by God). No government since has operated under the same covenant as Israel. Therefore, capital punishment is to stand in the place of God and decide what is good and what isn't in terms of God's creation. When we do this we blaspheme the image of God both within ourselves and in the one whose life we are taking.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts